down state news

Most Popular Past Articles
  • 07:03 - 07.08.2010 News >> Latest

     British doctor among 10 victims of 'Taliban' ambush   Dr Karen Woo was among ten aid workers ambushed and shot dead by gunmen in a remote area of northern Afghanistan. Read Article    

    Read more...
  • 16:52 - 18.01.2010 News >> Latest

     In Germany, a Tradition Falls, and Women Rise“All change,” she said, requires “a change in the head.”   

    Read more...
  • 03:50 - 14.08.2009 News >> Latest

       From Times of London Online August 14, 2009 Air traffic controllers suspended after Hudson River crash
    An air traffic controller who was on duty during last week’s tragic mid-air collision over New York’s Hudson River, has been suspended for allegedly talking on the phone at the time of the fatal crash, which killed nine people. The American Federal Aviation Administration has also suspended a supervisor who was not in the control centre in Teterboro, New Jersey, as required. The aviation watchdog said that while there was no reason to believe that the employees' actions contributed to the tragic accident, such conduct “is unacceptable”. Air traffic controllers are expected to be alert at all times while on duty and are given regular breaks, sometimes hourly, for that reason. The two employees, who were not identified by the FAA, were placed on administrative leave with pay. The FAA said it has begun disciplinary proceedings against the controller, who was handling the small plane that collided with a tour helicopter, and against the supervisor on duty at the time.
    Related Links Hudson crash raises fears over tourist flights Nine killed as aircraft collide over New York Bird hits were like hail, says Hudson pilot Multimedia Pictures: Hudson mid-air collision Three members of a Pennsylvania family on the plane and five Italian tourists and a pilot, a New Zealand man named Jeremy Clarke, on the helicopter were killed when the two stricken aircraft plunged into the river. The moment of collision was captured by a friend of the Italian tourists, who was filming their joyride from a ferry on the water below and unwittingly captured their deaths on camera. The amateur video…

    Read more...
  • 14:46 - 24.05.2010 News >> Latest

     Obama to honour McCartney Ex-Beatle to perform at the White House and receive Gershwin Prize. Read Article  

    Read more...
  • 10:02 - 22.11.2009 News >> Latest

     Inside the mind of a female suicide bomberAn increasing number of female jihadis are being recruited and trained to blow themselves up in the name of Islam. Alissa J Rubin visits an Iraqi jail to find out what makes young women turn themselves into killing machinesAlissa J Rubin The Observer, Sunday 22 November 2009 Article history Ranya in Baquba jail, where she shared   "Each woman's story is unique, but their journeys to jihad do have things in common. Many have lost close male relatives. Baida and Ranya lost fathers and brothers. Many of the women live in isolated communities dominated by extremists, where radical understandings of Islam are the norm. In such places, women are often powerless to control much about their lives; they cannot choose whom they marry, how many children to have or whether they can go to school beyond the primary years. Becoming a suicide bomber is a choice of sorts that gives some women a sense of being special, with a distinguished destiny."     

    Read more...
DownState News
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
Free vs. Paid Content. Print E-mail

 

A pile of recycling
February 8, 2010
Media Cache

Free vs. Paid, Murdoch vs. Rusbridger

DATELINE — Welcome to the liveliest fight on Fleet Street. In the blue corner, we have Rupert Murdoch, chief executive of News Corp. In the red corner, Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian. Each wants to knock out the other’s vision of the future of journalism.

On paper, it’s no contest. Mr. Murdoch is the heavyweight champion of the media world; an old-fashioned brawler whose prizes include newspapers like The Sun, The Times of London, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Post. Mr. Rusbridger is a relative flyweight, a Harry Potter lookalike who runs a single, modest-size publication.

But paper is passé. This battle is over cyberspace, which has a way of leveling the odds. And when Mr. Murdoch or his newspapers are involved, Mr. Rusbridger doesn’t pull his punches.

He drew the first blood in the current round, which centers on whether newspaper Web sites should charge their readers; Mr. Murdoch says yes, Mr. Rusbridger, no.

Having “ruthlessly cut the price of his papers to below cost in order to win audiences or drive out competition,” Mr. Rusbridger said in a recent speech, “this same Rupert Murdoch is being very vocal in asserting that the reader must pay a proper sum for content — whether in print or digitally.”

Mr. Rusbridger said so-called pay walls would be a bad idea for The Guardian’s journalism, which has benefited from the free exchange of ideas on the Web, and for its business, which hopes to translate growth in readership into increased advertising revenue.

Newspapers that defy these trends, he said, risk “sleepwalking into oblivion.”

Until recently, with online advertising growing at double-digit rates and print revenue in decline, Mr. Rusbridger’s position reflected the conventional wisdom of the news industry. But Internet ad growth stalled during the recession, prompting many publishers to rethink their business models.

Mr. Murdoch says he plans to start erecting pay walls for all of News Corp.’s newspaper Web sites this year. One of them, The Wall Street Journal, already charges online readers.

News Corp. is not alone. The New York Times, which owns the International Herald Tribune, says it intends to start charging some Web readers in 2011 under a metered system that will offer users a limited number of free articles. Publishers like Axel Springer of Germany say they are also moving ahead with plans for paid digital content.

But Mr. Murdoch has been the most outspoken proponent of pay walls, and he responded to Mr. Rusbridger’s jabs with an uppercut.

When asked, during a conference call last week on News Corp.’s earnings, for his opinion on Mr. Rusbridger’s view, Mr. Murdoch responded with an expletive.

If Mr. Murdoch and Mr. Rusbridger are on opposite sides of an ideological divide, it is in part because of profound differences in the enterprises they oversee. The Guardian is owned by a nonprofit trust, and Mr. Rusbridger acknowledged in his speech that it lost money. News Corp. looks out for its shareholders, even if some of its newspapers, like The Times, remain unprofitable.

The divide is about more than business models. Mr. Murdoch clearly has no time for the brand of liberalism represented by Mr. Rusbridger and The Guardian. Michael Wolff, an American journalist, writes in a recent biography that Mr. Murdoch described Mr. Rusbridger as “kooky” in an interview. Mr. Rusbridger’s newspaper, meanwhile, wastes no chance to take a swing at Mr. Murdoch. Last summer, it published a series of front-page stories alleging that a News Corp. tabloid, The News of the World, had engaged in widespread telephone surveillance of British celebrities and public figures. News Corp. says The Guardian was simply dredging up an old story in which it had already admitted to hacking into some mobile phones.

Despite all the current bluster, Mr. Rusbridger and Mr. Murdoch may not be as far apart as they would like to think on the issue of paid vs. free. The Guardian already charges for an iPhone application. It seems unlikely, meanwhile, that Mr. Murdoch will erect ironclad walls around his newspaper sites. More likely some of the content will remain free, with the paid services perhaps including offerings from other News Corp. Web sites or partners. But the sparring between Mr. Murdoch and Mr. Rusbridger should continue to entertain.

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Latest News
Links
UpState News

© 2010 Down State News - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development